Most people I have met tell me:
Art needs time, time needs money, hence art need money.
I dont think it does, you find artist who sacrifice both money and security for their art. We all need food and water, but how one gets it and how much time one spends getting it differs from perons to person. One can find artists all over the world, from the poorest countries to the richest.
"Art requires not just time, but also the resources to pay for the necessary medium".
but this all depends on what kind of art you create. e.g. art brut
In your opinion does ART need MONEY?
I thought time was money? Either way the equation works.
I think that, in most cases, being an artist does cause a financial drain if that is your only source of income. It's hard to become established, and once you are, you have to invest the time (which you could use for a regular job %26amp; paycheque) in creating new pieces. Most of the time it doesn't pay off.
If you are considering becoming a professional artist, I wouldn't advise that you quit your day job.
Reply:art is a natural gift. but to advance and became successful you Mead plenty money
Reply:Even art brut requires an infusion of medium. Poo smears on a wall still requires a wall. Somebody paid for the wall. The only exceptions I can think of are drawings in the sand at public beaches and similar field art (and even that is debatable in a culture where land becomes a commodity).
broken teeth
No comments:
Post a Comment